Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
NYPD Deputy Commissioner, Operations Kaz Daughtry
@NYPDDaughtry
·
17d
The statement discusses the actions of the NYPD in controlling the narrative around a mass arrest action by creating their own media content and restricting press access. This raises significant concerns about transparency, freedom of the press, and the public's right to information.
- The statement suggests harm may be done by restricting information and manipulating the narrative, which could mislead the public or obscure accountability. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The dignity of the press and possibly the arrested individuals is compromised by not allowing journalists access to cover the event transparently. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The action does not promote understanding or compassion but rather controls the narrative to possibly present a biased view of the events. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Using influence to shape media coverage in this way does not seem to be for the betterment of society but rather for controlling public perception. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The responsible use of a platform, in this case, the NYPD's media capabilities, is called into question as it appears to be used to restrict free speech and transparency rather than enhance it. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.