Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) addresses a significant public issue concerning freedom of the press and the implications of governmental actions on international media operations. The statement is clear, direct, and focuses on condemning a specific government decision while highlighting potential broader impacts on media freedom.
- The statement aims to do no harm but rather seeks to protect journalists and uphold media freedom, aligning well with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of all parties by focusing on the actions and policies without attacking individuals personally. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting the potential dangers to media freedom, the statement promotes understanding and awareness about the importance of a free press. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a government decision, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the broader implications for media freedom. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- CPJ uses its influence to advocate for the rights and safety of journalists, aiming to better society by ensuring that media outlets can operate freely and without undue interference. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by defending Al-Jazeera’s right to operate and by using its platform to speak out against policies that could inhibit media freedom. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.