Matt Taibbi

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 148

The statement in question is part of a multi-layered conversation on Twitter that touches upon issues of free speech, civil liberties, and the handling of protests related to different social groups. The discourse involves a critique of perceived double standards in the treatment of protests concerning different social issues, such as those advocating for trans, African-American, or LGBTQ rights compared to other protests. This conversation is a substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but discusses perceived inequalities in protest handling, which could be seen as an attempt to highlight social injustices. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on general groups rather than specific individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    While the statement aims to highlight perceived social injustices, it could be more effective in promoting understanding and empathy by providing more context or solutions.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of criticism but remains focused on the issue rather than attacking individuals directly. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to discuss important societal issues, aiming to provoke thought and debate on the subject of free speech and protest handling. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public debate about the rights of different groups and the perceived inconsistencies in their treatment. [+1]