Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 305

The statement 'Real AGI won’t need prompt contortions' is a response in a conversation about the performance and reliability of language learning models (LLMs) and their implications for the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI). The statement is part of a technical discussion on the limitations and future expectations of AI technologies, which is a topic of public interest and relevance in the field of technology and AI development. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse as it engages with substantive issues concerning AI technology, a significant societal and technological concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but rather contributes to a technical discussion on AI. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing solely on AI technology without targeting any individuals negatively. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting expectations for future AI development, though it is not explicitly empathetic or compassionate.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism of current AI models without personal attacks, focusing on the technology itself. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to discuss the potential betterment of AI technology, which could benefit society by setting expectations for more reliable and effective AI. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds principles of free speech responsibly, contributing thoughtfully to the discourse on AI without misinformation or harmful content. [+1]