Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement by @GaryMarcus addresses the issue of self-regulation in the tech industry, particularly in the context of social media. It criticizes the current state of affairs where tech companies are largely free to regulate themselves, suggesting that this has led to negative outcomes. The statement is part of a broader discussion on the need for external regulation in the tech industry, especially concerning artificial intelligence, as indicated by the linked article.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harms caused by lack of proper regulation in the tech industry, indirectly striving to prevent harm by advocating for change. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By criticizing self-regulation, the statement promotes understanding of the potential dangers and encourages a dialogue on better regulatory practices. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the tech industry's practices without personal attacks, focusing on the issue of self-regulation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment through more effective regulation of the tech industry. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to engage in a public discourse about an important societal issue, maintaining integrity in the discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.