Jill Stien

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 237

The statement provided is a highly charged and potentially misleading claim that a Jewish woman presidential candidate was assaulted and arrested by 'Biden-backed police' for protesting against 'Biden’s genocide.' This statement appears to be an exaggeration or distortion of the actual events described in the tweet from @DrJillStein, which states that Jill Stein was arrested at a protest against Washington University's ties to the war on Gaza. The image shows a scene of law enforcement at a protest, but does not provide evidence of assault or direct involvement by President Biden.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially harms individuals or groups by spreading unverified and highly charged accusations. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved by misrepresenting the circumstances of their arrest. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing instead on creating a divisive narrative. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue but rather spreads potentially inflammatory misinformation. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge the actual circumstances of the arrest, failing to correct misinformation. [-2]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to spread potentially harmful and divisive misinformation rather than bettering society. [-2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of responsible and integrity-driven use of platforms to discuss public issues. [-2]