The statement is a factual recount of an event where Don Lemon asked a question regarding the race of officers involved in a high-profile case. The tone is neutral and journalistic, and the content is focused on reporting a question asked during an interview without providing commentary or opinion.
- The statement reports on a question asked in an interview without causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not revealing personal information or engaging in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement itself does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement reports on a dialogue that could lead to constructive criticism and discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to report on a matter of public interest, which could contribute to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on an interview question without bias or irresponsibility. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.