Gavin Newsom

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -100

The phrase 'Let's go, Brandon!' has become a politically charged euphemism that is often used to express disapproval of President Joe Biden. In the context provided, it appears to be a response to a tweet by NBC News about President Biden's call to ban assault weapons, following the introduction of Brandon Tsay, who disarmed a gunman. The statement is a form of political speech that is critical of the President, and its use here could be interpreted as undermining the serious context of the conversation about gun control and the actions of Brandon Tsay. The image provided shows President Biden during a State of the Union address, with Vice President Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy in the background.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may indirectly cause harm by trivializing the serious context of gun violence and the actions of a hero. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target any individual's private life.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and compassion for the gravity of the situation being discussed. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses a slogan that is dismissive of the President's position. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not acknowledge the context of the conversation about gun control and the actions of Brandon Tsay. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses political speech in a way that may not contribute positively to the discourse on an important social issue. [-1]