The statement appears to be a light-hearted commentary on a public figure's choice of meal, referencing the President and First Lady of the United States ordering the same dish at a restaurant. The tone is conversational and does not seem to intend harm, disrespect, or to incite any negative actions. It simply points out a trivial aspect of the couple's dining habits that became a topic of interest online.
- The statement does no harm as it discusses a benign subject. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals by not delving into personal matters beyond a public dining choice. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not require promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- There is no critical dialogue or disagreement present, so this principle is not applicable.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not appear to use influence for societal betterment, but it also does not detract from it in this context.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by discussing a public figure in a non-inflammatory manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.