The New York Times
@nytimes
·
1027d
The statement is a serious commentary on the current political situation in Israel, reflecting concerns about national security and the stability of international relationships. It is not lighthearted, comical, or conversational, and it directly touches on the principles of the oath for public discourse.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by calling attention to a perceived threat to national security, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks a direct promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on security concerns.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue and reflection on the part of those who may be risking security, which aligns with engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to address a matter of public concern, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to express concerns about government actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.