The statement reports on a claim made by the Nebraska State Senate that combines controversial topics such as abortion, the Great Replacement theory, and misogyny. The tone appears to be critical and the intent is to inform about a stance that could be considered harmful and divisive.
- The statement reports on harmful rhetoric that could incite harm or division, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement itself does not violate privacy or dignity, but it reports on rhetoric that could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of certain groups.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it reports on divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a report on a stance rather than an engagement with it.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement reports on the use of influence that is not for the betterment of society, as it promotes a divisive narrative. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement itself uses the platform responsibly to inform, but it reports on the use of free speech in a potentially irresponsible manner.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.