In reply to:
Rep. Dean Phillips 🇺🇸
@RepDeanPhillips
·
960d
Rep. Dean Phillips 🇺🇸
@RepDeanPhillips
·
960d
Rep. Dean Phillips 🇺🇸
@RepDeanPhillips
·
960d
The statement is part of a thread discussing the actions of a member of Congress, George Santos, and the perceived inadequacies of the House Ethics Committee. The tone is critical and suggests a desire for accountability and reform. The intent is to express dissatisfaction with the current ethics oversight and to advocate for the expulsion of a member deemed harmful to the integrity of Congress.
- The statement aims to hold a public figure accountable without resorting to harmful language, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing personal information, focusing on public conduct related to the role of a Congress member. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While the statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, it does not violate this principle as it focuses on accountability.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about ethics and governance, inviting further discussion on the matter. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by seeking integrity in public office. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss matters of public interest with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.