The statement expresses concern about the integrity of educational materials and the potential rewriting of history. It implies a commitment to transparency and historical accuracy, and it criticizes actions that may undermine these values. The tone is assertive and suggests a call to action against what the speaker perceives as an attempt to distort historical facts. The image provided is a letter from the Governor of California addressing the issue of textbook content and requesting information from publishers, which supports the statement's context.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to prevent harm by ensuring historical accuracy in education.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the dignity of historical figures and events by opposing their erasure.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement promotes understanding by advocating for accurate historical representation.
[+1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement is part of a dialogue addressing a disagreement over educational content.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement seeks to correct what the speaker sees as a mistake in the handling of educational materials.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement uses the speaker's platform to address a public concern responsibly.
[+1]