In reply to:
The statement is a factual recount of a political event, noting the narrow margin by which Democrats gained control of the State Senate and the subsequent control of both legislative chambers and the governor's mansion in Minnesota. The tone is neutral and informative, without any apparent intent to harm, disrespect, or incite. It is a continuation of a conversation started by a tweet from Barack Obama, which points to the consequences of elections in the context of Minnesota's legislative session.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no signs of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in dialogue but provides factual information relevant to the conversation.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform about the political process, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by highlighting the importance of voting. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, sharing information without manipulation or falsehood. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.