The statement expresses a strong opinion on the issue of pharmaceutical pricing and the role of the American taxpayer. It suggests a change to the Constitution if current laws are deemed unconstitutional, indicating a desire for policy reform. The tone is critical but not disrespectful or harmful.
- The statement does not intend to harm but to express a viewpoint on policy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does reflect a concern for the burden on taxpayers.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue on the issue of pharmaceutical pricing and constitutional law. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to suggest a change for what the speaker believes would be the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.