The statement presents an opinion on a Supreme Court ruling and suggests a move beyond race-based admissions, advocating for diversity through other means. The tone is assertive and the intent is to comment on educational policies.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but could be perceived as dismissive to those who believe race-based admissions are necessary for diversity. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a policy change but lacks a clear call for empathy and compassion towards those affected by the ruling. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue on the topic of admissions policies, though it does not directly engage with opposing views.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to promote what the author sees as a betterment of society by advocating for diversity in college admissions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.