Cornel West

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 117

The statement is a critical commentary on a U.S. Congressional Resolution regarding Israel, suggesting that both the resolution and the Israeli state are fundamentally flawed due to racism. The tone is accusatory and the intent seems to be to challenge and condemn the actions and policies of both the U.S. and Israel.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful to those who support the resolution or the Israeli state. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of individuals, but it does make broad generalizations about states.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on condemnation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it labels the resolution a 'sham' and the states 'racist'. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence to highlight perceived injustices, but it may not contribute positively to society if it polarizes rather than fosters understanding. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not do so with the integrity of promoting constructive civic dialogue. [-1]