Reposted by Gavin Newsom
The statement in the image appears to be a political commentary on a decision made by a school board regarding textbook content. It criticizes the motives of the school board majority, suggesting that their actions are not in the interest of parents' rights but rather driven by an extremist agenda. The statement accuses the board of attempting to control information and censor educational materials, framing the issue as one of historical integrity and ideological struggle. The tone is confrontational and implies wrongdoing on the part of the school board members, suggesting they may be subject to a civil rights investigation.
- The statement is critical and confrontational, which could be seen as harmful if it incites division or hostility. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks, but it does label a group as 'extremists,' which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the author's perspective on the issue, but the confrontational tone may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived social issue, but the accusatory tone may not contribute positively to society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.