The statement critiques the practice of Supreme Court Justices earning money from book deals, suggesting it is ethically equivalent to earning from side jobs, which is not permitted. It calls for higher ethical standards and the closure of income loopholes. The linked article provides context and evidence for the statement's claim.
- The statement aims to address an ethical concern without causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of an ethical issue in the judiciary. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue on the ethical standards for public officials. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement seeks to use influence to improve ethical standards in society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss matters of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.