Reposted by Gavin Newsom
The statement is political in nature, expressing opposition to a specific issue on the ballot. It questions the motives of a political group and urges action against a proposed change. The tone is critical and implies negative consequences if the issue passes.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but uses strong language that could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical and does not offer a balanced view. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided argument against the issue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence for what the author believes is the betterment of society by encouraging a vote against Issue 1. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but may lack some integrity by not presenting a balanced view and implying motives without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.