In reply to:
NPHS Panther Prowler
@NPProwler
·
838d
The statement is positive and encouraging, acknowledging the importance of seeking the truth and holding people accountable. It is a response to a question asked by a reporter to a public figure about book banning, which is a topic of public interest.
- The statement does no harm and is supportive in nature. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not reveal any private information or degrade anyone. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and compassion by valuing the role of accountability in public discourse. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement encourages constructive criticism and dialogue by praising the act of asking important questions. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement acknowledges the reporter's efforts, which is a form of correcting broader societal mistakes by ensuring accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly to encourage public discourse and the pursuit of truth. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.