The statement is critical of perceived inconsistencies between stated positions and actions taken by policymakers. It raises concerns about support for the military, social safety nets, and foreign aid, suggesting a discrepancy between words and deeds.
- The statement aims to hold policymakers accountable without causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of those affected by the policies in question. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages empathy for troops, vulnerable populations, and allies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue on the consistency of policy actions with stated values. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge the speaker's own position or potential biases.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to question policy decisions and encourage reflection. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss important societal issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.