In reply to:
Jake Sherman
@JakeSherman
·
733d
The statement in question provides information about the current state of the tunnel walks from Cannon to the Capitol, explaining that construction reroutes have made the journey longer and that certain exits are easier to use. The tone is informative and seems intended to clarify the situation in response to a previous statement that questioned the difficulty of navigating the Capitol Hill area. The content is factual and relevant to the conversation about accessibility and navigation in the Capitol area.
- The statement does no harm as it provides helpful information without any negative implications. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by offering clarity and potentially helpful information to those affected by the construction reroutes. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform and clarify the situation, which could be considered a contribution to the betterment of society, especially for those working in or visiting the Capitol area. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.