Reposted by Gavin Newsom
Rep. Ken Calvert
@KenCalvert
·
818d
The statement is political in nature, advocating for the support of a candidate opposing Jim Jordan for Speaker. It suggests that endorsing Jim Jordan is aligned with extremism and implies that electing his opponent would be a step towards removing such extremism. The tone is assertive and promotes a specific political action.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but could be seen as indirectly harmful by labeling someone as an extremist without providing context or evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards the endorsed candidate.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather promotes a political action against someone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence for what the author perceives as the betterment of society by supporting a political candidate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as lacking in integrity if the claim of extremism is unfounded.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.