The statement is defensive and contradictory, with the intent to clarify the relationship between the public figure and a lawyer, and to address the public figure's stance on the 2020 Presidential Election. It does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, and it contains divisive language that could undermine public trust in democratic processes. The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, does not acknowledge or correct mistakes, and may not use influence for the betterment of society or uphold responsible use of the platform.
- The statement could contribute to harm by undermining trust in elections. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not foster understanding or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct mistakes but instead changes the narrative. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement's influence may not be for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement may not be using the platform responsibly. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.