Lex Fridman

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 49
10/29/2023, 10:43:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
756d
@tegmark @RishiSunak @vonderleyen Altman, Hassabis, and Amodei are the ones doing massive corporate lobbying at the moment.
They are the ones who are attempting to perform a regulatory capture of the AI industry.
You, Geoff, and Yoshua are giving ammunition to those who are lobbying for a ban on open AI R&D.

If…
Max Tegmark
@tegmark
·
756d
Yann, I'd love to hear you make arguments rather than acronyms. Thanks to @RishiSunak & @vonderleyen for realizing that AI xrisk arguments from Turing, Hinton, Bengio, Russell, Altman, Hassabis & Amodei can't be refuted with snark and corporate lobbying alone.
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
789d
The UK Prime Minister has caught the Existential Fatalistic Risk from AI Delusion disease (EFRAID).
Let's hope he doesn't give it to other heads of state before they get the vaccine.

"An AI safety summit at Bletchley Park in November is expected to focus almost entirely on…

The statement is conversational and lighthearted, expressing enjoyment of the debate and a casual intent to join the conversation. It does not contain any harmful, disrespectful, or non-constructive elements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not intend to harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement maintains a tone of camaraderie, suggesting a willingness to engage in a friendly manner. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement implies a future intention to engage in dialogue, although it does not provide constructive criticism itself. [+1]