Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 74
11/1/2023, 1:33:13 AM
X
In reply to:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
696d
AIPAC endorsed scores of Jan 6th insurrectionists. They are no friend to American democracy.

They are one of the more racist and bigoted PACs in Congress as well, who disproportionately target members of color.

They are an extremist organization that destabilizes US democracy.
AIPAC | Text ISRAEL to 24722 | #StandWithIsrael
@AIPAC
·
697d
Instead of standing with Israel, @RepThomasMassie voted with @AOC, @RashidaTlaib, @Ilhan, @JamaalBowmanNY, and @SummerForPA.

Massie and the Squad:
❌ Opposed supporting Israel.
❌ Opposed condemning Hamas.

The statement in question is part of a political debate involving AIPAC's endorsements and actions, as well as the responses of various politicians. The tone is critical and accusatory, with strong language used to describe AIPAC's behavior and impact on democracy and race relations. The content involves allegations of racism, bigotry, and extremism, and it criticizes AIPAC's political activities and endorsements. The image provided shows a congressional vote tally on a resolution, highlighting the names of those who voted 'No' and those who were 'Present', which is used to support the argument being made in the conversation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses harsh language that could be seen as harmful to the reputation of the organization being discussed. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals but makes strong accusations against an organization.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is confrontational and divisive. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but may not be seen as constructive due to its accusatory nature. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to influence public opinion on a political matter, but the approach may not be conducive to betterment. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not be using the platform with the intended integrity due to the strong language used. [-1]