In reply to:
Rep. Dean Phillips 🇺🇸
@RepDeanPhillips
·
378d
Rep. Dean Phillips 🇺🇸
@RepDeanPhillips
·
378d
The statement is a critique of a censure resolution, labeling it as irresponsible and damaging, and expressing approval for bipartisan rejection of the resolution. The tone is disapproving of the censure and supportive of the bipartisan action.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions, but rather expresses relief at the prevention of potential harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by condemning hate speech and not engaging in it. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by appreciating bipartisan efforts to end what is seen as a damaging accusation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the censure without personal attacks, focusing on the action rather than the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote the betterment of society by supporting bipartisan efforts to reject damaging political actions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by criticizing the censure, which could be seen as an attempt to silence, and does so responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.