Reposted by Speaker Mike Johnson
The statement provides a critical perspective on the current administration's handling of border security, specifically addressing the redistribution of border agents and the resulting increase in crossings at the northern border. It implies a causal relationship between the 'Biden Border Crisis' and broader national security implications.
- The statement aims to highlight a perceived policy failure without directly causing harm, but it could be seen as contributing to a polarized view of the issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals but rather discusses policy. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticism of policy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather assigns blame for the situation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge any complexities or nuances in border security policy, nor does it correct any potential misconceptions. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to draw attention to a specific viewpoint on border security, which could contribute to public debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by expressing a critical viewpoint on a matter of public policy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.