The statement is a response to a conversation about suspending those advocating genocide. The tone is somber and reflective, expressing dismay at the state of the world. The intent seems to be to agree with the sentiment against advocating genocide and to lament the circumstances that make such a stance necessary.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, showing empathy for the gravity of the topic. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and compassion by acknowledging the sadness of the situation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While not directly engaging in dialogue, the statement supports constructive action against harmful advocacy. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement indirectly supports the use of influence for the betterment of society by agreeing with the suspension of those advocating harm. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by supporting the suspension of harmful speech, thus using the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.