The statement is a critique of Secretary Mayorkas' actions and expresses support for border patrol agents. It addresses the issue of accountability and the treatment of law enforcement personnel in the context of a public controversy.
- The statement uses the word 'shame' which could be seen as an attempt to do harm with words, but it is also a common expression in political discourse to express disapproval. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not violate the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is focused on criticism rather than fostering a positive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a particular group (border patrol agents) and could be seen as an attempt to correct what the author perceives as an injustice, which could be for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.