The statement addresses the issue of anti-science sentiment in public discourse and emphasizes the importance of scientific and engineering innovation for humanity's progress. It acknowledges the potential for corruption among scientists but affirms that most are commendable. The tone is concerned yet hopeful, and the intent is to advocate for science and reason in public discourse.
- The statement does not intend to harm with words but rather to express concern and promote the value of science. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and acknowledges the human aspect of scientists, fostering empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by not dismissing the possibility of corruption but also emphasizes the positive contributions of most scientists. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for the celebration of scientific achievements, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.