The statement is critical and expresses disappointment with the outcomes of COP28, specifically the lack of commitments to phase out fossil fuels. It attributes this outcome to what is perceived as failed U.S. leadership.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but expresses a strong opinion on the impact of the agreement.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of frontline nations and communities by advocating for their interests. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The tone is critical but aims to promote understanding of the perceived shortcomings of the agreement. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but does present a clear stance on the issue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a mistake to acknowledge or correct.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for environmental justice, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.