The statement appears to be a critique of a predecessor's failure to deliver on infrastructure promises, contrasting it with the speaker's own claimed success. The tone is critical but not disrespectful or harmful.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not seem to intend harm but is critical of a predecessor's performance. It does not use harmful language.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism. It is a one-sided assessment of the predecessor's performance.