New York Times Opinion
@nytopinion
·
789d
The statement is critical and addresses a specific individual's actions, suggesting they have not learned from a past event. It compares the individual favorably to another, implying a more respectful approach in the past. The tone is confrontational but not overtly hostile.
- The statement is critical but does not seem to intend harm. It expresses disappointment rather than aggression. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical without offering constructive insight. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not invite constructive dialogue or show openness to understanding differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.