The statement introduces an audio version of an article about a new feature for fact-checking by NewsGuard. The image accompanying the statement poses the question 'Who fact-checks the fact-checkers?' which suggests a critical perspective on the reliability and oversight of fact-checking entities. The tone of the statement is neutral and informative, simply announcing the availability of an audio version of the article. The image, however, has a more provocative tone, using a bold font and a graphic of a question mark with a drop that resembles blood, which could be interpreted as suggesting that fact-checking organizations may have serious flaws or consequences that need scrutiny.
- The statement and image do not appear to cause harm but rather invite critical thinking. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The image promotes dialogue and critical thinking about the accountability of fact-checking organizations. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform about a new feature and potentially to encourage accountability in media. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement and image uphold the principles of free speech by fostering a discussion about the integrity of fact-checking processes. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.