Cornel West

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 118

The statement expresses disappointment with the perceived dilution of a reparations bill and advocates for community empowerment over bureaucratic control. It is critical of the current form of the legislation and implies a desire for further action or amendments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is critical but does not appear to cause harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement implicitly promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of community involvement in reparations. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the bill without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes as it is a critique of external actions.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for what the author believes would be a better approach to reparations. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by using the platform to discuss public policy responsibly. [+1]