The statement discusses journalistic integrity and the responsibility of confirming information before publication. It criticizes the inclusion of unverified 'raw intelligence' in reporting and implies that doing so is not responsible journalism. The tone is critical but focused on professional standards in journalism.
- The statement upholds the principle by advocating for responsible journalism that avoids harm through spreading unconfirmed reports. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by emphasizing the importance of confirming information before sharing it with the public. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of journalistic practices. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle by advocating for journalistic practices that contribute positively to society by avoiding the spread of unverified information. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement supports responsible use of free speech and journalistic platform by emphasizing the need for integrity in reporting. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.