Commish. Davante Lewis
@davantelewis
·
639d
The statement expresses disagreement with a decision made by the President and the EPA regarding environmental policy, suggesting it will lead to negative consequences such as environmental racism and the proliferation of false solutions to climate issues. The tone is critical and the intent is to voice concern and opposition to the policy decision.
- The statement aims to do no harm by raising awareness of potential negative impacts of the policy decision, but it could be seen as indirectly harmful to the reputations of those involved in the decision-making process. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks, focusing instead on policy. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech, but it does not explicitly promote understanding or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the policy decision, but it does not engage in dialogue with those in disagreement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes as it is a critique of a policy decision.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to try to bring attention to what the author perceives as a societal issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to express a critical viewpoint responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.