The statement appears to be a critical commentary on the persistence of certain political agendas despite voter opposition. The tone suggests frustration or disapproval of 'institutional America's' disregard for voter sentiment regarding 'the colonial project.'
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but uses strong language that could be seen as aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise awareness of a perceived issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive criticism and dialogue by presenting a viewpoint that could lead to discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight a societal issue, which could be seen as working for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.