The statement presents a factual claim about a decrease in homicide rates across various cities in the United States, accompanied by an image that provides specific data to support this claim. The tone of the statement is informative, and the intent seems to be to highlight a positive trend in crime statistics. However, the question about whether a particular news outlet will run the graphic introduces a speculative and potentially divisive element, as it implies doubt about the outlet's willingness to report positive news that may not align with a perceived narrative.
- The statement does not cause harm but questions the integrity of a news outlet without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could discourage constructive dialogue by preemptively casting doubt on a news outlet's reporting practices. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not correct a mistake but rather speculates on future actions of a news outlet.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement questions the responsible use of a platform by a news outlet without substantiation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.