The statement is emotionally charged and suggests that the situation at the border is dire. It is intended to draw attention to the issue and provoke a strong reaction from the audience.
- The statement may be seen as adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions, as it does not contain harmful language but rather expresses concern. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not single out individuals or groups in a negative light. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a direct promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on eliciting emotional responses. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a broad emotional appeal rather than a specific critique or discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to draw attention to an issue, which could be seen as working towards the betterment of society if the issue is of genuine public concern. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly, assuming the speaker is accurately representing the situation at the border. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.