Asa Hutchinson

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 246

The statement calls for a decisive U.S. military response to attacks by Iranian-backed Houthis, suggesting a specific course of action to 'take out' their attack capability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement advocates for a military response, which could potentially cause harm, depending on the nature and execution of the action. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of the U.S. but does not address the dignity of all parties involved in the conflict. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy towards the broader implications of military action on all affected populations. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote dialogue or constructive criticism but rather advocates for a unilateral military response. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for a specific policy action, which could be seen as betterment of society from the perspective of national security but may not be viewed the same way universally.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to express a strong opinion on foreign policy responsibly, but it may lack integrity if it does not consider the full consequences of such actions.