The statement has a confrontational tone and is critical of the treatment of unvaccinated individuals during the pandemic. It questions whether apologies are due to them now that new information has come to light. The linked article's title suggests a critique of public health officials and shaming campaigns related to Covid-19 decisions.
- The statement uses aggressive language ('fuck them anyway' mode) which could be harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to violate privacy or dignity, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses a confrontational approach. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement's intent seems to be to highlight perceived injustices, which could be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment, but the approach may not be effective.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses free speech to challenge public discourse but may not be doing so with the integrity and responsibility outlined in the oath. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.