The statement is a critique of the President's decision to order air strikes against Yemen, suggesting it may be unconstitutional and a misuse of the Authorization to Use Military Force. It emphasizes the role of the House of Representatives in declaring and authorizing war.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions, but rather expresses a concern for constitutional adherence. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, and compassion, but it does raise awareness about constitutional processes which could lead to a more informed public.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a public figure's actions without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a potential constitutional issue, which could be seen as working for the betterment of society by upholding the rule of law. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a matter of public concern with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.