The statement is a critique of the January 6 Committee's approach and expresses support for a new phase of investigation led by Rep. Barry Loudermilk. It accuses the Committee of partisanship and lack of transparency, suggesting an alternative narrative to the events of January 6.
- The statement implies harm by accusing the Committee of obfuscation, which could be seen as harmful to the integrity of the investigation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the previous committee's efforts and promotes a singular viewpoint. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or acknowledge the possibility of disagreement in a respectful manner. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a particular viewpoint on a significant societal issue, but it is unclear if this is for the betterment of society or partisan interests.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may lack responsibility and integrity if the accusations of obfuscation and hiding evidence are unfounded.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.