The statement addresses a public issue related to the proposed Congressional map in the Louisiana Legislature, expressing concern over its presentation and advocating for the existing map's constitutionality and a legal trial on its merits. This engages with a societal issue and contributes to civic dialogue, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by advocating for a legal trial on the merits of the map, which could foster empathy and compassion for the democratic process. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the proposed map without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for what the speaker believes is the betterment of society by upholding constitutional processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.