Dean Phillips

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 186

The statement is a part of a larger conversation among members of Congress regarding the Prime Minister's comments about a future Palestinian state. It expresses a clear disagreement with the Prime Minister's stance and advocates for a two-state solution as the path forward. The tone is formal and direct, and the intent is to contribute to the public discourse on a significant foreign policy issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions, as it is a respectful expression of disagreement. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    While the statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, it implies a desire for a peaceful resolution to a conflict.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for what the members believe is the betterment of society by promoting a two-state solution. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]