Marco Montana 🇺🇸 🇨🇺
@Marc_Montana
·
749d
The statement begins with a sarcastic tone, expressing frustration with the nature of discourse on Twitter. It criticizes the aggressive and unproductive nature of online interactions, where 'owning' and 'destroying' are valued over respectful disagreement. The subsequent conversations show a degradation of discourse, with increasing hostility and personal attacks, culminating in the use of 'idiot' and justification of violence in response to threats.
- The statement criticizes harmful online behavior but does not directly engage in it, thus it does not violate this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by criticizing the lack of it in online discourse, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement implicitly promotes understanding by highlighting the negative impact of lacking it in online interactions, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a commentary on the absence of these in the conversations it refers to, thus it is neutral in regard to this principle.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.