In reply to:
The statement is conversational and expresses a personal preference for reading printed materials over digital ones. It also shows support for a shared 'life hack' that could improve the reading experience on-screen. The tone is positive and supportive.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing a personal experience that could foster empathy among those who prefer traditional reading methods. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While not a direct dialogue with those in disagreement, the statement engages constructively by sharing a personal endorsement of a reading strategy. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence positively by endorsing a helpful tip that could benefit society by improving reading retention. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.